Love, Politics, & Refugees

Christians who have voiced concern over immigration have been met with a wave of articles challenging their compassion, courage, and love. The consensus of many is that loving refugees in a Christ-exalting way means supporting a more open immigration process. The main concern with this conclusion is the way Old Testament passages are being used to support it.

The selections below are from an article featured on Overall the article has a very positive message that highlights the opportunities for evangelism created by immigration, but the brief discussion of the Old Testament texts may leave the door open for confusion regarding what exactly our biblical responsibility is.

The author frames the political conflict by saying:

In the wake of terror attacks in Paris and Beirut, the response from Americans — even among Christians — has been as strong as it is divided. While many have called for Americans to follow their nobler impulses and respond in compassion, courage, and love by welcoming refugees, many others (including now a majority of the country’s state governors) have voiced their strong disapproval for accepting any refugees, citing significant security concerns.

 David Crabb Building His Church in a Refugee Crisis – (full article available here)

From the author’s vantage point, people who support immigration are operating out of compassion, courage, and love. The inference is that compassion, courage, and love will automatically result in support for government sponsored immigration policy.

This is a big jump that needs some reflection. While some of the loudest voices of opposition to immigration are clearly full of hate, there may also be some compassionate and loving voices that recognize the Christian’s responsibility to protect all of our current neighbors from terror as well.

The author turns to two Old Testament texts and a passage from Matthew to support the idea that showing compassion and love means welcoming refugees:

God cares about these refugees suffering, and so should we. This is an opportunity for us to “do justice and righteousness, and deliver from the hand of the oppressor him who has been robbed. And do no wrong or violence to the resident alien, the fatherless, and the widow” (Jeremiah 22:3). The heart of our Father towards refugees is evident throughout the Scripture: “Let the outcasts of Moab sojourn among you; be a shelter to them from the destroyer” (Isaiah 16:4). When we feed the hungry, give water to the thirsty, and clothe the naked, we do so as unto the Lord (Matthew 25:34–40).

“Doing justice and righteousness” is extremely important. It is the foundation of David’s eternal throne (Psalm 89:14) and the only condition God placed on his covenant promises to Abraham.

“For I have chosen him, that he may command his children and his household after him to keep the way of the LORD by doing righteousness and justice, so that the LORD may bring to Abraham what he has promised him.” Genesis 18:19 ESV

Thank you Jesus for keeping this condition and “doing righteousness and justice” perfectly (2 Corinthians 1:20).

The Question: What exactly does “righteousness and justice” entail for us today in this crisis?

In the second verse, Isaiah 16:4, we see a great example of what it means to “do justice and righteousness.”

“Let the outcasts of Moab sojourn among you; be a shelter to them from the destroyer.” (Isaiah 16:4)

The book of Ruth is a picture of this verse in action. As a Moabite, Ruth had been cursed by God and excluded from the assembly of the Lord for the rejection of his people on the way out of Egypt (Deuteronomy 23:3). She decides to abandon her hertiage in Moab and cling to a Jew from Bethlehem.

Naomi, Ruth’s mother-in-law, left the comfort of her own country to go across the Jordan River into the enemy territory of the Gentiles. When she decided to return to the Promised Land, Ruth clung to her. And because of her faithfulness to this Jew she found safe passage across the Jordan into an inheritance among God’s covenant people.

It is essential to remember that the asylum Ruth found in Israel was entirely different than what she would have received as a citizen of Egypt or Assyria. In addition to food and safety, she gained a King who promised her a hope and a future.

So how do we welcome the Moabite in our current situation?

The outcasts from Moab are those who have rejected God and suffer from the curse of being excluded from his assembly and the covenants of promise (Ephesians 2:12). Isaiah 16:4 and the story of Ruth show that outcasts can still have a seat at the table in the kingdom of God. A person who has rejected God can still find peace, security, and an inheritance among God’s covenant people by clinging to a Jew from Bethlehem.

What I mean is the New Testament fulfillment of Isaiah 16:4 is not immigration to America.

America is not the Promised Land.

The opportunities for evangelism that will come from immigration are a beautiful picture of God taking what men meant for evil and turning it for good. They are, however, only a small part of the biblical model. The author states that those welcoming refugees into the country are the ones showing compassion, courage, and love. I’m sure that is the motivation of many, but sometimes politics can be used by the church as a smokescreen to avoid our true calling.

What is our calling?

Certainly it is to show love with reckless abandon in the way we welcome refugees, but we are called to welcome them into our family, not our country or our neighborhood.

Overwhelmingly the biblical mandate is to “Go!” Like Naomi, we are to take the gospel across the Jordan into enemy territory and invite people to live “among us” as those who eagerly wait for a city that is to come. My favorite passage that illustrates this concept is Hebrews 13:11-14:

“For the bodies of those animals whose blood is brought into the holy places by the high priest as a sacrifice for sin are burned outside the camp. So Jesus also suffered outside the gate in order to sanctify the people through his own blood. Therefore let us go to him outside the camp and bear the reproach he endured. For here we have no lasting city, but we seek the city that is to come.” ESV

Syrian Refugee Camp in Jordan

Syrian Refugee Camp in Jordan

Outside the city gate is where crucifixions took place, where bodies were burned, and where the lepers set up refugee camps.

The call is to go outside the city gate and to “pour ourselves out as a drink offering” in order that some might find citizenship in heaven. Self-sacrifice is the only type of sacrifice the Bible commends and the gospel demands. To require the same level of sacrifice from our unbelieving neighbors is not consistent with our calling.

Let us leave the temporary security of cities that will not last and go to where Jesus is, outside the camp, and suffer with him as we “fill up what is still lacking in Christ’s afflictions” (Colossians 1:24).

Our calling is to go to Syrian refugees and welcome them to live “among us” as God’s children who are waiting for citizenship in the New Jerusalem. Hopefully we will be able to do this more and more in the context of our own neighborhoods as the government catches up to the demands of the crisis, but our calling exists independent of anything the American government will ever do and our faithfulness to Isaiah 16:4 will not be accomplished through any immigration law.

We should continue to push our government to help these people, but in doing so we must remember that our ability to welcome refugees into the commonwealth of Israel will never be compromised by any politician or the walls they threaten to build.

Whether it is at home or abroad, the people truly “doing righteousness and justice” in this crisis are with the refugees right now.

Bradley Mooney is the recruiting coordinator at the Kanakuk Institute and graduate of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary.


Subscribe to The Tribe Journal for more Articles from our Teachers

* indicates required

3 Responses to “Love, Politics, & Refugees”

  1. Ben Harmon

    Proverbs 24:21
    “My son, fear the LORD and the king, and do not join with those who do otherwise,”
    “Or the walls they threaten to build” ….are you inferring that walls that are meant to protect us are bad? Was it a wrongdoing when Nehemiah went back to Jerusalem to build a wall around it to protect them from enemies? Is it bad to promote immigrating legally via the laws of the land?
    “God loves tribes, tongues, peoples, and nations that is why they will be present at the throne of Jesus as people whom he has redeemed”
    The no-border globalist policies already failed at the Tower of Babel. God made distinct nations and we need to be vigilant as to who we let in this country so as to protect our future generations from people who migrate to this country who are a threat to our safety and our values.

    • kanakukinstitute


      Thanks for the message. Sorry for the slow response. I am in complete agreement with that approach to immigration policy. The issue I am concerned with is how Christians are tying immigration policy to the fulfillment of Old Testament passages. My hope with the article is to show Christians that our ability to offer refugees a hope and a future is not tied to any decision our government will make about immigration. Even if millions of people find peace and stability in America, that is not “the shelter from the destroyer” Isaiah was talking about. Someone outside of Christ is still a stranger to the covenants of promise and excluded from the commonwealth of Israel (Ephesians 2:12), even if they are safe from ISIS. I believe providing people with food, shelter, and safety is part of the gospel message, but thinking that is all we need to do and that it is the government’s responsibility to do it is the kind of thinking I’m hoping to challenge. Thanks again for reading. Let me know if you have further thoughts.

      Brad Mooney


Leave a Reply

  • (will not be published)

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>